PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 CHANGES IN CHINA'S PRIVATE FINANCING MODELS AND THE CONCERNING REGULATIONS ?.THE ANCENT "HEHUI" MODEL IN CHINA B.OVERALL PATHS AND REGULATIONSFOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE FINANCING IN CHINA CHAPTER 2 ESTABLISHMENTS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING AND FUND-RAISING FRAUD A.PONZI SCHEME AND ILLEGAL FUND-RAISING B.LEGISLATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLICDEPOSIT ABSORBING AND FUND-RAISING FRAUD IN CHINA 1.A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 2.STIPULATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING 3.REGULATIONS FOR FUND- RAISING FRAUD C.A BRIEF SUMMARY: HIGHLYCONVERGENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF THE TWO CHARGES PROOF RULES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CHAPTER 3 THE PURPOSE OF "ILLEGAL POSSESSION" PUARTHER BLUR THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN TWO CRIMES A.LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE PROOF FOR THE PURPOSE OF "ILLEGAL POSSESSION" IN FUND-RAISING CASES B.THE SIGNIFICANCE OF YING WU'S CASE C.JUDICIAL PRACTICE AFTER YING WU 1.YIMIN DU FUND-RAISING FRAUD CASE 2.OTHER TYPICAL CASES PUBLISHED BY THE SPC 3.ANALYSIS FOR THE GUIDING CASE RELEASED BY THE SPP D.COMMENTS ON THE PROOF MODE FOR 「ILLEGAL POSSESSION」 PURPOSE CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS: THE ADJUDICATION ATTITUDE AND TREND FOR ILLEGAL FUND-RAISING CASES A.ANALYSIS FOR DATA COMING FROMCJO AND OTHER DATABASES 1.DATA OF ADJUDICATIONS ASTO ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING 2.DATA OF ADJUDICATIONS AS TOFUND-RAISING FRAUD 3.DATA ANALYSIS a.OVERALL TREND FOR THE ADJUDICATIONS b.ANALYSIS FOR THE AREA DISTRIBUTIONS OF CASES c.OTHER ISSUES SEEN FROM THE DATA B.DATA RELEASED IN THE OVERNMENT WORK REPORTS BY SPC AND SPP OVER THE YEARS C.DATA FROM OTHER SOURCES CHAPTER 5 THE INFLUENCE OF INVESTOR'S LEGAL STATUS DETERMINATION AND REMEDY ON JUDICIAL CONVICTION ATTITUDE IN ILLEGAL FUND RAISING CASES A.LITIGATION STATUS OF COMMON INVESTORS B.THE SCOPE OF THE ACCOMPLICE C.THE DIFFERENT AMOUNT CALCULATION FOR FUNDS RAISED BASED ON DIFFERENT INVESTORS' LEGAL STATUS 1.CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNT OF FUND RAISED IN CASES OF FUND-RAISING FRAUD 2.CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNTOF FUNDS RAISED IN CASES OF ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING 3.THE AMOUNT NOT TO BE CALCULATED D.THE FURTHER STRENGTHENED PROSECUTION AND JUDICIAL SLANTED ATTITUDE TOWARDS ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING BY THE DIFFICULT ECOVERY AND COMPENSATION PROCEDURES 1.THE IMPACT OF "CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRIOR TO CIVIL PROCEDURE" PRINCIPLE ON INVESTORS' CLAIMS 2.THE PRACTICAL EFFECT OF RECOVERY AND COMPENSATION CONCLUSION
[